<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: XM Satellite in Deep Trouble</title>
	<link>http://cashintellect.com/2006/07/26/xm-satellite-in-deep-trouble/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: warpjam</title>
		<link>http://cashintellect.com/2006/07/26/xm-satellite-in-deep-trouble/#comment-30</link>
		<author>warpjam</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 12:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cashintellect.com/2006/07/26/xm-satellite-in-deep-trouble/#comment-30</guid>
					<description>To me its crazy that people would pay for radio! Radio has been free for nearly 100 years and just because The king of all media decides to move to this pay format consumers are lulled into thinking that its ok to pay for it. The delivery method may be slightly different but at the end of the day its still only audio pushed over signal to a mobile or stationary box. How can that be worth 14.95 a month (plus a $200 hardware investment) ?!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me its crazy that people would pay for radio! Radio has been free for nearly 100 years and just because The king of all media decides to move to this pay format consumers are lulled into thinking that its ok to pay for it. The delivery method may be slightly different but at the end of the day its still only audio pushed over signal to a mobile or stationary box. How can that be worth 14.95 a month (plus a $200 hardware investment) ?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
